<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should We Be Taking Bing Seriously?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fusionunlimited.co.uk/2009/06/15/should-we-be-taking-bing-seriously/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fusionunlimited.co.uk/2009/06/15/should-we-be-taking-bing-seriously/</link>
	<description>the north's leading online marketing agency</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Navon</title>
		<link>http://blog.fusionunlimited.co.uk/2009/06/15/should-we-be-taking-bing-seriously/#comment-2534</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Navon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fusionunlimited.co.uk/?p=386#comment-2534</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff. It seems to early in the day to be writing off Google though. And whilst there may be people concerned about its share, consumers/users are voting with their search patterns. Google has a huge share for a reason. You'd expect Bing to make some inroads over time. But is it good enough to take a serious slice of the search pie? One to watch...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff. It seems to early in the day to be writing off Google though. And whilst there may be people concerned about its share, consumers/users are voting with their search patterns. Google has a huge share for a reason. You&#8217;d expect Bing to make some inroads over time. But is it good enough to take a serious slice of the search pie? One to watch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

